Ontario appeal court hearing case of man with HIV convicted of sex assault
A man convicted of three counts of aggravated sexual assault because he didn't disclose his HIV-positive status before sex is taking his case to Ontario’s top court today.
The man, identified by the initials N.G., is requesting the Court of Appeal for Ontario overturn his convictions based on new evidence that proper condom use is enough to prevent transmission of the virus.
In the trial, which ended in November 2017, the court heard that N.G. correctly used condoms in sexual encounters with three women who consented without knowing his HIV status.
As it stands, common law says that a person with a low viral load who uses a condom does not need to inform sexual partners of their status.
The trial judge found that the condoms weren't enough in N.G.'s case because he did not have a low viral load, raising potential doubt about the possibility of transmission despite wearing a condom.
Defence lawyer Wayne Cunningham is arguing that condoms are enough to prevent transmission and the common law should reflect that.
- LATEST: Ontario up to 3,630 confirmed cases, with 131 in Halton
- All Burlington parks closed to vehicular access in response to COVID-19
- Province issues another emergency alert in response to COVID-19
- Ontario reports over 450 new COVID-19 cases, 100 cases confirmed in Halton
- Trudeau announces millions in funding for women's shelters and sexual assault centres
- A Number of Condoms Are Being Recalled
- Charges dropped against Ontario couple in citizen’s arrest case
- Court rejects move to put passenger rights rules on hold pending appeal
- New Bill would require judges to undergo training in sexual assault law
- Supreme Court of Canada to hear appeals on solitary confinement